Executive Summary

   The clinical research industry represents a significant source of healthcare innovationand economic prosperity for countries. As a primary gateway into Asia and a centralplayer in the region, Thailand is an emerging provider of clinical trials. World-classinfrastructure, a universal healthcare system, and national policies that supporta developing clinical research industry make Thailand well positioned to pursuefurther growth in the clinical research industry.

Read more...

   The current status of the industry suggests that these underlying benefits forconducting clinical research in Thailand have not been fully realised and that othercountries in the region, such as South Korea and Taiwan, have been able to moresuccessfully attract clinical trials. Over the 2010-2015 period, over 4,000 clinicaltrials commenced in South Korea, around 2,000 in Taiwan but fewer than 1,000 (967)in Thailand .

   The Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers Association (PReMA) in Thailandcommissioned Deloitte Access Economics to provide a detailed and objective analysisof the economic and health related benefits of clinical research in Thailand. The teamadopted a mixed methods approach to the study which comprised a survey,interviews and desktop analysis.



Methodology

   The survey of PReMA members, clinical research organisations and universities ascertained trialemployment and cost data, the number of local participants and sites, and challenges andopportunities for Thailand based clinical research. Face to face stakeholder interviews wereperformed to further explore survey findings and collect qualitative information. Desktop researchand analysis sought to complement, triangulate and fill gaps. Sources referenced included clinicaltrial databases (clinicaltrials.gov, Thai Clinical Trials Registry)1, government departments (Ministryof Public Health, Office of the National Economic and Social Development Board) and publishedpapers.

Read more...

Methodology

  • PReMA members
  • Clinical Research Organisations
  • Universities

20 surveys, representing 67% response rate amongst member companies (involved with research)

Several submitted surveys were populated with indequate cost data of conducting clinical trials in Thailand

A number of local face to face consultations were conducted:

PReMA members9
CROs2
Med Res Net2
Universities7

Discusstion focused on the current clinical research environment in Thailand, its challenges, impediments and pportunities

Publicly available information was sought to complement, triangulate and fill gaps indentified during the survey and consultation phases

Sources included:

  • Peer reviewed journal articles
  • Clinical Trials.gov
  • Ministry of Public Health
  • World Health Organization
  • Thai Clinical Trials Registry

Outcomes of consultations contributed to aStrengths Weaknesses Opportunities and Threats(SWOT) analysisand the development of policy recommendations.

This occurred in tandem with economic analyses. The costs and benefits investigated were:

  • Direct and indirect economic contribution This is broadly equivalent to the addition to Thailand’s gross domestic product (GDP) made by both the organisation which conduct clinical trials and by the businesses which supply goods and services to those organisations. For example, if a pharmaceutical company engages a contract research organisation (CRO), the value added includes not only the profits earned by the CRO, but also those made by the electricity utility, medical equipment makers and data storage companies from supplying the goods and services used in the trial.

  • Economic value of medicines produced Companies pay for trials in the hope that, eventually, this will result in new medicines coming to the market. Clinical trials are long and expensive, and most of them do not result in new medicines. For those that do, there are often lengthy public approvals processes, followed by only a limited period under patent protection to try to recoup development costs. This report estimates the long-term economic value of medicines produced as a result of clinical trials conducted in Thailand in 2015.

  • Health benefits Most long run improvements in health are due to better medicines and medical devices. These in turn are the result of medical research, most of which is in the form of clinical trials. While most of these benefits accruing to the Thai population will be from international trials, some will also be due to trials conducted in Thailand. This report uses standard techniques to assign a financial value to the years of healthy life so gained in Thailand.


These benefits are compared to the costs of conducting clinical trials in Thailand in 2015 using a cost benefit analysis framework.


1 As listed on www.ClinicalTrials.gov. Does not include trials only listed on domestic registries.


Results

   The SWOT analysis found the most important factors for attracting foreign clinical trial investment to Thailand are the large treatment-naïve patient population and the highly skilled workforce. The lengthiness of the independent ethical approval process and the import licence approval process were considered the biggest impediments to increased foreign investment in clinical research.

Read more...

SWOT analysis for clinical trials in Thailand


Thailand as a clinical trials provider

Thailand is well equipped to be a strong contender in the international clinical research market.

Read more...

Number of clinical trials commenced in
Thailand, by year and phase

Based on Deloitte Access Economics analysis, it is estimated that฿10.4 billion (USD 0.32 billion) was spent on clinical trials in Thailand in 2015. Of this, the majority, or 75% (฿7.8 billion, USD 0.24 billion) was on Phase 3 research. Phase 1 has the lowest cost (around 3% of total trial costs).

There wereover 111,000 Thai trial participants in 2015 and approximately 38% of clinical trials in Thailand had pharmaceutical companies as sponsors. It is estimated that expenditure on trials sponsored by private industry was ฿3.94 billion (USD 0.12 billion).

In 2015, there were an estimated 8,905 full time equivalents (FTEs) directly employed in clinical trials in Thailand, who were paid approximately ฿4.9 billion (USD 0.15 billion). Additionally,6,604 FTEs were employed in industries related to the clinical research sector. These include upstream industries such as: post and telecommunication; pulp, paper and cardboard; and electricity.2

Clinical trials contributed approximately ฿8.8 billion3 (USD 0.27 billion) to Thailand’s GDP in 2015which represents approximately 0.05% of Thailand’s GDP for 2015. Of this, ฿2.0 billion (USD 0.06 billion) resulted from contributions to upstream industries.


2 The three largest industries are ranked by value of the inputs they supply to research.

3 There is a positive contribution to GDP based on the following process: total expenditure on trials (฿10.4billion) represents direct gross output, which is larger than the contribution to GDP (฿8.8 billion), equalling the total (direct and indirect) contribution to value added.


Clinical trials conducted in 2015 are estimated to result in profits from future medicine sales sufficient to generate a 4.2% rate of return, in net present values. That is, future return will be 104.2% of current total trial costs (including successful and unsuccessful trials). Clinical trials conducted in Thailand in 2015 are expected to resultin net economic return of medicines produced of ฿436 million (USD 13.4 million).


Medical research also significantly improves the morbidity and mortality of a country, accounting for roughly half of the annual reduction in the burden of disease and injury. Using World Health Organization data, it is estimated that 3.01 million disability adjusted life years (DALYs) averted in Thailand in 2015 can be attributed to worldwide medical research. Given clinical research accounts for 75% of all medical research, 2.26 million DALYs per year were saved due to worldwide clinical trials. The DALY reduction that arose from Thailand based research equated to 8,326 DALYs. The dollar value of wellbeing gains attributable to local clinical research can also be estimated using the market-based value of a year of healthy life for Thailand (฿1.8 million, USD 0.06 million)). The net present value of expected health benefits arising from clinical research conducted in Thailand in 2015 is ฿10.5 billion (USD 0.32 billion).


Based on data from the World Health Oraganisation and Deloitte research, the value of expected health benefits arising from clonical research conducted in Thailand in 2015 is ฿ 10.5 billion

All costs and benefits arising from clinical research in Thailand in 2015 were compiled and compared through a cost benefit analysis. Compare to total costs of ฿10.4 billion, total benefits sum to ฿30.0 billion (USD 0.9 billion), with a benefit-cost ratio of 2.9:1.This means that for every ฿1 spent on clinical trials in Thailand in 2015, the return was ฿2.9.



Policy recommendations

During consultations, key stakeholders considered that the main reason Thailand had been obtaining a decreasing share of regional multinational trials was the need for regulatory reform. In particular, Thailand needs to reduce regulatory review and approval timelines. Participants were universally willing to pay higher registration fees to achieve this outcome. There is also a pressing need for more accredited trial sites in the rural areas which are home to large treatment-naïve populations, one of Thailand’s key advantages.

Read more...

Based on the experiences of Taiwan, Korea and Singapore after they streamlined their regulatory processes, Deloitte believes it should be possible for Thailand to achieve similar growth rates in numbers of multinational trials as its regional competitors. Some five years after reforming their clinical trials regulations, each of these countries were receiving around twice as many international trials as they had had five years before the reforms. Similarly Thailand’s competitors (those nations plus Vietnam, Malaysia, Cambodia, and the Philippines) have experienced combined average growth rates in international trials around one third higher than Thailand has over the five years to 2015.If Thailand streamlined its regulatory processes, like its competitors, it should be feasible to increase total trials in Thailand by around 20%, with an attendant increase of some ฿3.9 billion (USD 0.1 billion) annually in net benefits.

Overall, Thailand is in a good position for fostering new growth in the market for clinical trials and clinical research. However, the current status of the industry suggests that the underlying benefits for conducting clinical research in Thailand are not being fully realised. In order to realise these benefits, it is recommended that Thailand:

1. Address regulatory efficiencies to make Thailand more competitive.

  • i) Increase number regulators and capacity building programs with international partners.
  • ii) Centralise IRB and approval Boards.
  • iii) Eliminate customs tariff for medicines used in Clinical Trials.
  • iv) Increase the number of accredited trial sites and skilled workers, particularly in rural areas.

2. Prioritise innovation enhancement policies that promote clinical research.

  • i) R&D and innovation policies adopted and coordinate intra-ministerially among MOPH MoST MoE, and MoC.
  • ii) Increase promotion of clinical trial capacity of Thailand domestically and overseas.
  • iii) Development of annual clinical research in biopharmaceutical index to measure progress.

3. Implement sustained reforms by creating an inclusive multidisciplinary National Clinical Research Task Force to establish a detailed roadmap for the clinical research development in Thailand.

As shown by Wong (2011)4, implementation of such recommendations can bring about marked increases in clinical trial activities, particularly in the early stage clinical trials and R&D where opportunities to value add are greatest.


PHARMA BY NUMBER

  • Industry spend 141.6 Billion USD on R&D per year
  • Drug Development for Particular Disease
    • o Cancer 1,813
    • o Diabetes 475
    • o HIV/AIDS 159
    • o Cardiovascular 559
  • 5 of the 10 Leading global R&D firms were Research – Base Biopharmaceutical companies
  • Annual Spending by the Biopharmaceutical: Industry is 5 times greater than the Defence & Aerospace Industries

PHARMA & GLOBAL HEALTH BETWEEN 2000-2008
  • VACCINE HELPED REDUCE NUMBER OF MEASLES DEATH IN AFRICA BY 92%
  • IN 2014 IFPMA MEMBERS HAD 186 ONGOING R&D PROJECTS REGARDING DIEASES OF THE DEVELOPING WORLD
  • 88% R&D projects for NTDs are in partnerships between IFPMA members companies and +80 partners from universities, public and private sector, and NGOs
  • We are 3 largest global funder in NTDs research
  • Our investments in NTD research reached USD 401.2 million in 2013
  • 8 R&D centers are dedicated solely to searching for new cures for NTDs
  • 500 million immunized since 2000

PHARMA ECONOMIC FOOTPRINT
  • Biopharmaceutical market will reach 1.3 trillion by 2018
  • In 2012, Biopharmaceutical industry added USD 436.8 Billion to the world GDP similar to the economy of a country like Argentina
  • The Global biopharmaceutical industry (including Generic) employed over 4.4 million and paid USD 91.3 Billion in salaries
  • Global Health Partnerships IFPMA members have a strong track record in building strategic alliances for global health